이원란의 문학서재






오늘:
89
어제:
156
전체:
5,020,170

이달의 작가
영문 수필
2010.09.20 14:44

Were They Radicals or Conservatives?

조회 수 518 추천 수 58 댓글 0
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
Were They Radicals or Conservatives?
------------------------------------


Wolran Kim / Sep 2010



Were the Patriots who fought for American Independence fighting for change and reform or for a preservation of their way of life?

Generally, the cause of a fight is a conflict of opinion according to gain or loss. A cause of war is a clash between people who want to take and people who want to keep. Edward Abbey (1927~1989), American author and essayist said, "A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." What's the difference between radical patriots and conservative patriots? I heard that radicals do something; conservatives just talk about doing something. Radicals are the people who pursue change and development of society according to legality of history and conservatives are the people who want to keep and protect tradition from alteration.

The American Revolutionary War (1775~1783) that won political independence for 13 of Britain's North American colonies, formed the United States of America. We can decide if the victims of this war were radicals or conservatives after considering the origin of the fight.  
The biggest factor was excessive taxation of colonists by Britain. After the end of the costly French and Indian War (1763, Paris Conference), Britain imposed new taxes for import: sugar, treacle, salt, and iron. This was indirect taxation so it didn't cause much repulsion. The problem was the Stamp Act. The colonists were in opposition to heavy duties under the slogan "No taxation without representation." Britain wasn't convinced but they canceled the Stamp Act in a moment because the Stamp Act was unpopular.

The other cause was Indian Reservations which were built by Britain. Colonists supported Britain when they fought against the French union with Indians. After that, colonists wanted entry to fertile lands in the middle-west. But Britain established Indian Reservations on those areas and they had to shoulder the expense every time when there was trouble between colonists and Indians. Impedimenta Law was offended by colonists who had to bear the expenses of troops. In 1770, the Boston Massacre occurred between the British army and colonists and in 1773, the Boston Tea Party which gave rise to Revolutionary War. In 1778, an army for national independence gained a first victory at the Battle of Saratoga and the union of national independence and French won Battle of Yorktown after French participated in the war. In 1783, Britain government approved independence of America officially at the Treaty of Paris. (Cyber Hall for democracy and human rights information)

This war was one of the inevitabilities of history between colonists who didn't want to the plundered anymore and rulers who wanted to keep taking by force. The British Crown misunderstood that the colonists increasingly saw themselves as a separate people, due their own voice in their own affairs. A series of British political missteps, outright blunders, and heavy handedness stirred the colonists to become patriots. By 1776, a growing number of Americans, including George Washington, were convinced that Britain was embarked on a systematic plan to strip them of their property and reduce them to slavery.

“The Revolution was truly multifaceted.” There was a rebellion of the colonial gentry against British noble who refused to accept them as equals. There was also a rebellion by merchants and shippers who chafed at British trade controls and royal monopolies. There was a conservative revolution, which sought to defend traditional liberties against British outrages. And there was a radical revolution, inspired by the call for liberty and equality in the Declaration of Independence, which sought to create a society that could serve as a model of freedom for the rest of the world. (American Revolution)

They needed change. They wanted better life and society against their native country's encroachment which grew more serious. The process of sudden change is always written as WAR in history and the consequence of sacrifice is an exorbitant price. Colonists became an independent country. Servants became the masters. Radicals were much more common than conservatives even though it depends on who is doing the labeling.  

  

?

List of Articles
번호 분류 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
171 바람과 함께 살아지다 이월란 2012.01.17 511
170 피카소 시집 이월란 2009.10.29 512
169 견공 시리즈 지진이 났다(견공시리즈 60) 이월란 2010.04.13 514
168 제3시집 잠수종과 나비 이월란 2011.04.09 515
167 나의 통곡은 이월란 2010.04.18 516
166 어제는 자유 이월란 2010.10.29 516
165 발칸의 장미 이월란 2010.01.07 517
» 영문 수필 Were They Radicals or Conservatives? 이월란 2010.09.20 518
163 형이상학의 본질 이월란 2010.07.19 519
162 피터 팬 증후군 이월란 2010.04.18 520
161 제1시집 의족(義足) 이월란 2008.05.07 521
160 흙비 이월란 2010.03.22 523
159 영시 윤동주시 번역 8 이월란 2010.06.07 525
158 그리운 이에게 이월란 2010.09.20 526
157 제1시집 장대비 이월란 2008.05.07 527
156 그녀의 펌프질 이월란 2009.04.17 527
155 비렁뱅이 어사또 이월란 2009.06.10 531
154 제3시집 구두의 역사 이월란 2009.09.29 531
153 중독 2 이월란 2010.07.09 532
152 아가페 미용실 이월란 2009.08.13 534
Board Pagination Prev 1 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 83 Next
/ 83